Sajad v. Chinsu Sajad
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Ernakulam dismissed the criminal revision petition as withdrawn. The petitioner's counsel sought leave to withdraw after settlement between parties.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 / 14TH KARTHIKA, 1941
Crl.Rev.Pet.No.787 OF 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CRA 97/2018 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT, MOOVATTUPUZHA
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN MC 66/2014 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS ,PERUMBAVOOR
REVISION PETITIONER/S:
SAJAD, AGED 29 YEARS, KANELIL HOUSE, OKKAL KARA, CHELAMATAM, (NOW RESIDING AT METROZ CEMENT PRODUCTS, ETHANNOOR, KODUVAYOOR.P.O, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678502).
BY ADVS. SRI.ANIL K.MOHAMMED SRI.V.S.MANSOOR SRI.P.G.GOKULNATH SMT.BINU K.B.
RESPONDENT/S:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sajad
- respondent
Chinsu Sajad
- respondent
Abdul Kareem
- respondent
Laila
- respondent
Bilal
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court