High Court of Kerala dismissed the Criminal Revision Petition filed by S. Anilkumar against the conviction and sentence in a cheque bouncing case (Section 138 NI Act) for default, as the appellant was not present and appeared uninterested in prosecuting the matter.
Criminal Revision Petition dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH
MONDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2019 / 11TH BHADRA, 1941
Crl.Rev.Pet.No.418 OF 2019
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CRA 84/2016 DATED 14-06-2016 OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT-II, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CC 2380/2014 DATED 29.02.2016 OF TEMPORARY SPECIAL COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS FOR THE TRIAL OF CASES U/S 138 OF N.I ACT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED:
S. ANILKUMAR
AGED 47 YEARS
S/O SREEDHARAN, AGED 49 YEARS, VALLARAVILA VEEDU, TC 55/1417, NEERAMANKARA, KAIMANOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695040, NOW HAVING ADDRESS A.K ENTERPRISES 174/1 NEIKKARAN PALAYAM, CHENNIMALAI ROAD, ALAMPADI POST, KANGEYAM, TAMILNADU PIN CODE NO 638701.
BY ADV. SRI.P.V.VENUGOPAL
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT&STATE:
1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN 682031.
2 JAYAKUMAR S/O RAVEENDRAN,TC 215/50 KALADI,KARAMANA P.O.THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695002
SR.PP.C.N.PRABHAKARAN
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.09.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.Rev.Pet.No.418/2019 2
ORDER
Dated this the 2nd day of September 2019
The case has been adjourned since 06.06.2019 onwards. There was no representation for the revision petitioner on this day also. It appears that the revision petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
Therefore, Crl.R.P is dismissed for default.
Sd/-
MARY JOSEPH
JUDGE
JJ/
Crl.Rev.Pet.No.418/2019 3
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN C.C.2380/2014 DATED 29.02.2016 ISSUED BY SPECIAL COURT OF JFMC, TVM.
ANNEXURE B COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN CRIMINAL APPEAL 84/2016 DATED 14.6.2016 HONOURABLE ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE II, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
ANNEXURE C COPY OF DEPOSITION OF COMPLAINANT ADMITTING FACT AND ACQUAINTANCE WITH NEIGHBOR VINOD.
ANNEXURE D TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT BY VINOD AGAINST REVISION PETITIONER DATED 14.6.2016 BEFORE THAMPANOOR P.S.
ANNEXURE E TRUE COPY OF EXTRACT OF REGISTER IN THAMPANOOR P.S.
RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS:NIL
//TRUE COPY//
S. ANILKUMAR
STATE OF KERALA
JAYAKUMAR S/O RAVEENDRAN
MARY JOSEPH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
