re-cross examination. It is further noted therein that the Court can give permission to a party to put any question which might be put in cross-examination to his witness, if the Court is satisfied that the witness deliberately has given evidence with the intention to defeat the party who called him as a witness. Moreover, the provisions of Section 154 of the Evidence Act is not applicable to a party giving evidence before the Court and hence it has been noted by the appellate Court that it is not legally feasible to give permission to the petitioner under Section 154 of the Evidence Act. In the light of these aspects, both the Courts below have dismissed the above said plea made by the revision petitioner. The above said endorsement has been made by the learned Magistrate as early as on 31.10.2015 in the depositions and thereafter, the petitioner had also subscribed her signature to the depositions in terms of the requirements contained in Criminal Rules of Practice. Obviously the learned counsel for the revision petitioner and the revision petitioner would have been fully aware about the said endorsement as the she admittedly would have read the said deposition and then only signed the same and in that process, certainly, she would have noted the above said endorsement made by the learned Magistrate and if at all the above said endorsement was factually wrong, then the revision petitioner should have to immediately take steps to object to the same and to get corrected. On other hand, no such immediate action was taken and later, the
