passed against the appellants, etc. This Court in various cases as in Biju Eappan v. State of Kerala , reported in 2010 (1) KLT 289, has dealt with a similar case and has held that the appellate Sessions Court cannot set aside the conviction imposed by the trial court on the basis of the settlement arrived at between the parties, this Court exercising the extra ordinary inherent powers under Sec.482 of the Cr.P.C, could definitely, set aside the conviction and quash the proceedings when due to the settlement of all the matrimonial disputes, conviction passed by the learned Magistrate under Anx-A1 is necessarily to be interfered with, to secure the justice, exercising the powers under Secs.482 of the Cr.P.C. This Court had followed the dictum laid down by the Apex Court in the aforestated celebrated case in B.S.Joshi & ors. v. State of Haryana & anr , reported in (2003) 4 SCC 675 in that matter. In Crl.M.C.No.3535/2018, the offences alleged are those under Secs.341, 323, 324, 326 & 354 r/w Sec.34 of the I.P.C. This Court in a similar case in Crl.M.C.No.7840/2017 (order dated 22.11.2017) had quashed the impugned criminal proceedings in case where the accused was initially convicted by the trial court and during the pendency of the appeal, parties have arrived at a compromise. The petitioner in Crl.M.C.No.3535/2018 was a juvenile at the time of commission of
