Dismissed

Abdul Rasheed.N v. Central Bureau of Investigation

Kerala HC9 Jan 2019Crl.MC/174/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hexth High Court disposed of a criminal miscellaneous petition filed by an accused under Section 482 Cr.P.C. directing the Special Court to expedite the discharge application under Section 227 Cr.P.C. based on a CPR.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the trial court to dispose of the discharge application (Annexure IV) as expeditiously as possible, restricting review to materials in the final report.

Abdul Rasheed.N Vs Central Bureau of Investigation — Writ and Judicial Review | Kerala HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 19TH POUSHA, 1940

¶5

Crl.MC.No. 174 of 2019

¶6

SC 1357/2013 OF SPECIAL COURT FOR TRIAL OF CBI CASES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

¶7

PETITIONER/S:

¶8

ABDUL RASHEED.N AGED 54 YEARS S/O.M NOOHU KANNU, VARIKOLIL VADAKKATHIL, VENGARA, THODIYOOR NORTH.P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT, KERALA.

¶9

BY ADVS. SRI.S.RAJEEV SRI.D.FEROZE SRI.K.K.DHEERENDRAKRISHNAN SRI.V.VINAY

¶10

RESPONDENT/S:

¶11

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, (REPRESENTED BY STANDING COUNSEL) S.P-CBI-SCB THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. (CRIME NO.RC 1(S)/2012/CBI/SCB/CHENNAI.

¶12

OTHER PRESENT:

¶13

SRI C S HRITHWIK-SR PP

¶14

..2..

¶15

Crl.MC.No. 174 of 2019

¶16

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶17

ORDER

¶18

Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

¶19

The petitioner is one of the accused in SC No.

¶20

1357 of 2013 on the file of the Special Court

¶21

for the Trial of CBI Cases,

¶22

Thiruvananthapuram. He has filed Annexure-IV application under Section 227 Cr.P.C. for his discharge. The only request in this Crl.M.C. is to direct the trial court to dispose it of expeditiously.

¶23

After hearing both sides, I am satisfied that the request is reasonable.

¶24

In the result, this Crl.M.C. is disposed of directing the trial court to dispose of Annexure-IV application as expeditiously as possible. The learned Sessions Judge shall only look into the materials relied on by the

¶25

..3..

¶26

Crl.MC.No. 174 of 2019

¶27

investigating officer in support of the final

report.

Sd/-

K.ABRAHAM MATHEW

JUDGE

APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶34

ANNEXURE I TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY CBI WHICH IS TAKEN ON THE FILE AS CRL.M.C.NO.1554/2016.

¶35

ANNEXURE II TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 27.6.2017 IN CRL.M.C.1554/2016 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT.

¶36

ANNEXURE III TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY CBI BEFORE THE COURT OF SESSIONS, ERNAKULAM, IN CRL.MC.NO.279/2015.

¶37

ANNEXURE IV TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SPECIAL COURT CBI THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶38

BKA/10.01.2019

Abdul Rasheed.N v. Central Bureau of Investigation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Rasheed.N v. Central Bureau of Investigation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaji Vs State of Kerala

Sandhosh K.v., Vs State of Kerala

Shajahan Vs State of Kerala

Arunkumar K.C., Vs State of Kerala

The South Indian Bank Ltd., Vs State of Kerala

Noushad Vs the State of Kerala