Sandhul Aravind v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
In Crl.MC.No. 1620 of 2018, the Kerala High Court closed an application seeking to quash an excise occurrence report. The court noted that a final report had been filed by the Excise Inspector and cognizance had already been taken by the Magistrate Court, rendering the present quashing petition subservient to the rights to challenge the final report.
What did the court decide?
Case dismissed/closed with directions to applicants to challenge the final report via appropriate legal channels.