Dismissed
Dr. John Sajith Edwin v. D. Christudas
Kerala HCCrl.MC/1086/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
TUESDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 14TH PHALGUNA, 1940
Crl.MC.No. 1086 of 2018
ST 13/2017 of CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2:
DR. JOHN SAJITH EDWIN, JOINT DIRECTOR, DR. SM CSI MEDICAL COLLEGE, KARAKKONAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH P.NAIR
RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT, ACCUSED NOS.1,3,4,5,6 & STATE:
1 D. CHRISTUDAS,
GOOD HOPE, RC STREET, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN- 695 121.
4 DR. D. BENJAMIN, CHIEF EDITOR, CHRISTAVA DEEPIKA, CSI SOUTH KERALA DIOCESE, LMS COMPOUND, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001.
Crl.MC.No. 1086 of 2018
2
7 THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 031.
BY ADVS. SRI.P.RAHUL FOR R2 TO R5 SRI.P.P.RAMACHANDRAN FOR R6 SRI.V.V.ASOKAN (SR.) FOR R6 R7 BY SMT.M.K.PUSHPALATHA, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No. 1086 of 2018
3
ORDER
When the matter was taken up, Sri.Rajesh P. Nair, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submitted that the petitioner is not intending to prosecute the matter any further. The said submission is recorded and this petition is dismissed as not pressed.
SD/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V.,
JUDGE
//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE
DSV/6.3.19
Dr. John Sajith Edwin
D. Christudas
The State of Kerala
Raja Vijayaraghavan V
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court