Subran v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant in a criminal appeal died in 2018. With no one contesting the appeal, the High Court held the appeal abated applying the Full Bench decision in Pazhani and consigned it to the record room.
What did the court decide?
The Criminal Appeal stood abated and consigned to the record room.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
MONDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2019 / 3RD ASHADHA, 1941
CRL.A.No.90 of 2004
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN SC 100/2002 of ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC-I), MANJERI DATED 22-12-2003
APPELLANT/S:
SUBRAN, S/O.KUMARAN, MANCHERI VEETTIL, PADINHARAKKARA, TIRUR.
BY ADVS.
SRI.K.RAMACHANDRAN SRI.P.RAMACHANDRAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SUBRAN, SON OF KUMARAN
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM
- respondent
THE EXCISE INSPECTOR TIRUR EXCISE RANGE, TIRUR (MALAPPURAM DISTRICT)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court