The Court dismissed the Criminal Leave Petition for default as the petitioners intended not to prosecute the matter and made no representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH
WEDNESDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2019 / 13TH BHADRA, 1941
Crl.L.P..No.234 OF 2019
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CC 553/2010 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -II, MANANTHAVADY
O.R NO.1/2009 OF THOLPETTY WILD LIFE RANGE, THOLPETTY
PETITIONER/COMPLAINANT:
STATE REPRESENTED BY THE ASSISTANT
WILDLIFE WARDEN, THOLPETTY WILDLIFE RANGE.
BY SRI.C.N.PRABHAKARAN, SR.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED 1 TO 5:
1 NAGARAJAN, S/O. VENKIDACHALAM PILLAI, GOPAL NIVAS, BAVALI 670 645.
THIS CRIMINAL LEAVE PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04.09.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.L.P..No.234 OF 2019
2
ORDER
Dated this the 4th day of September 2019
No representation for the leave petitioner. It appears that the leave petitioner is not intended to prosecute the matter. Leave petition stands dismissed for default.
Sd/-
MARY JOSEPH
JUDGE
NAB
STATE REPRESENTED BY THE ASSISTANT WILDLIFE WARDEN, THOLPETTY
NAGARAJAN
PUTTU
SHIVARAJ
SOMAN
KRISHNA
MARY JOSEPH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
