Suneesh v. P.K.Anilkumar
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt of court petition arising from a writ petition concerning the non-construction of a fish landing pond, the Court held that since the necessity for construction remained unconsidered previously, contempt could not be held and the case was closed with liberty to file a separate writ petition.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed; liberty granted to petitioner to agitate the issue of non-construction via a separate writ petition.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
THURSDAY ,THE 07TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 16TH PHALGUNA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 747 of 2018 IN WP(C). 1144/2016
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WPC 1144/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 20-01-2016
PETITIONER:
SUNEESH, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O.VELAPPAN, MURIPARAMBIL(H), NATAKKAVU (P.O.), UDAYAMPEROOR, PIN - 692 307.
BY ADVS. SRI.K.NIRMALAN
SRI.V.JAYADRAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 P.K.ANILKUMAR (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, HARBOUR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT,KAMALESWARAM, MARUKADI(P.O.),THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 003.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's failure to construct the fish landing pond despite High Court directions amounts to contempt of court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SUNEESH
- respondent
P.K.ANILKUMAR
- respondent
JOMON K.GEORGE
- respondent
K.A.SAKEENA
- respondent
DR.P.SELVARAJ
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court