This is a notice stage contempt case filed for alleged disobedience of an interim order. The petitioner pleaded compliance and closure of the contempt case without prejudice to the main writ petition, which the court accepted.
The contempt case is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MAY 2019 / 30TH VAISAKHA, 1941
Con.Case(C).No. 701 of 2019 IN WP(C). 30097/2018
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 30097/2018 of HIGHCOURT
PETITIONER:
MUHAMMED SAFEER P., AGED 30 YEARS S/O.ABOOBACKER, KUZHIMANNA SECOND SOUTH, MALAPPURAM, PIN-673 641.
BY ADV. SRI.V.VISAL AJAYAN
RESPONDENTS:
ANOOP VARKEY, (AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, CIVIL STATION UPHILL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-673 001.
GP. SRI. MATHEW GEORGE VADAKKEL
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20.05.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-2-
Con.Case(C).No. 701 of 2019 IN WP(C). 30097/2018
JUDGMENT
The Contempt Case is filed complaining disobedience
of the interim order dated 15.11.2018 and the writ petition is still pending.
The learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions submits that the representation Ext.P6 is attended to and necessary c ommunication sent to the petitioner. Therefore, the Contempt Case is not pressed. Statement placed on record. Contempt Case is closed. The contentions available in the writ petition are left open for consider ation.
Sd/S.V.BHATTI JUDGE
JS
-3-
Con.Case(C).No. 701 of 2019 IN WP(C). 30097/2018
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.(C) NO.30097/2018 DATED 15.11.2018.
ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY RECEIPT OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT WITH PETITIONER, DATED ON 12.12.2018.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contemned party's claim that the representation is attended to warrants closing of the contempt case while the main writ petition remains pending.
Muhammed Safeer P.
Anoop Varkey
S.V.Bhatti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
