In this contempt case, the petitioner (Dr. Sreelekha.S) submitted that the directions in the underlying judgment had been complied with. The court accepted this submission and disposed of the contempt case accordingly.
The contempt case was disposed of having recorded that the petitioner's submissions regarding compliance of directions were accepted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MAY 2019 / 3RD JYAISHTA, 1941 Con.Case(C).No. 570 of 2019 IN WP(C). 42491/2018
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 42491/2018 of HIGHCOURT
PETITIONER/S:
DR. SREELEKHA.S, AGED 54 YEARS D/O SANTHADEVI AND SAMBASIVAN, PROFESSOR, TC7/676,CHALIAN VILAKATHU VEEDU, KOCHULLOOR, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O.TRIVANDRUM, PIN 695 011.
BY ADVS. SRI.M.P.RAMNATH SEI.M.VARGHESE VARGHESE SMT.S.SANDHYA SRI.ANTONY THARIAN SRI.BEPIN PAUL SRI.K.J.SEBASTIAN SRI.P.RAJESH (KOTTAKKAL) SRI.SHALU VARGHESE
RESPONDENT/S:
1 SAM CLEETUS, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER, DEPUTY COLLECTOR, (LA),COLLECTORATE CIVIL STATION, KODAPPANAKUNNU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN 695 043.
2 DR.K.VASUKI, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TRIVANDRUM, COLELCTORATE KODAPPANAKUNNU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN 695 043.
BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI.SAIGI JACOB PALATTY, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.05.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
==================
Contempt Case (C).No. 570 of 2019
==================
Dated this the 22nd day of May, 2019
J U D G M E N T
Sri.M.P.Premnath, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
submits that the directions in the judgment have already been complied with by the respondents and that the above contempt case may be closed accordingly. Recording the abovesaid submission made on behalf of the petitioner, the above contempt of court case
will stand disposed of.
Sd/-
sdk+
ALEXANDER THOMAS, JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
| ANNEXURE | A1 CERTI |
FIED | COPY OF | TH | E JUDGMENT DA | TED |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.1.2 WPC N |
019 O O 4249 |
F THIS HI 1/2018 |
GH | COURT OF KERALA | IN | |
| ANNEXURE | A2 TRUE 10.1. RECEI THERE |
PHOTO 2019 PT (2 UPON. |
COPY OF T WITH THE NOS) DAT |
HE P ED |
LAWYER NOTICE DA OSTAL REGISTRAT 10.1.2019 AFFI |
TED ION XED |
| ANNEXURE | A3 TRUE REPOR |
PHOTO T IN |
COPY OF RESPECT |
THE O |
TRACK CONSIGNM F CONSIGNMENT |
ENT NO |
| RL628 WEBSI |
826971 TE OF |
IN OBTAI INDIAN POS |
NED TAL |
FROM THE OFFIC DEPARTMENT |
IAL | |
| ANNEXURE | A4 TRUE ACKNO |
PHO WLEDGM |
TO COPY ENT CARD |
RET | OF THE POS URNED AFTER SERV |
TAL ICE |
| UPON ANNEX |
2ND R URE A2 |
ESPONDENT NOTICE |
HE | REIN IN RESPECT | OF |
DR. SREELEKHA.S
SAM CLEETUS
DR.K.VASUKI
ALEXANDER THOMAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
