Jose Paul.K v. Sunil Barthwal
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt proceeding, counsel submitted that the Respondent authorities complied with the earlier judgment dated 12.10.2018 in W.P(C). No. 4610/2015. The Court noted the representation and closed the contempt case without further orders.
What did the court decide?
contempt case closed following submission of compliance
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.HRISHIKESH ROY
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
MONDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF JUNE 2019 / 13TH JYAISHTA, 1941
Con.Case(C).No. 562 of 2019 IN WP(C). 4610/2015
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 12.1O.2018 IN WP(C) 4610/2015 PETITIONERS/2ND, 47TH, 48TH, 49TH, 50TH & 51TH PETITIONERS:
1 JOSE PAUL.K AGED 54 YEARS S/O.K.O.POULOSE, EMPLOYEE CODE NO.9814, KALAPARAMBATH HOUSE, THIRUVALLOOR, ALANGAD.P.O., ALUVA-683511.
2 RAJARAMADAS N AGED 54 YEARS S/O.P.R.NARAYANAN NAIR, EMPLOYEE CODE NO.11087, SOWPARNIKA, YMA ROAD, THEKKUMBHAGOM, THRIPUNITHURA.P.O., ERNAKULAM-682301.
- 3 RAVEENDRAN PILLAI V.K. AGED 54 YEARS S/O.CHANDRASEKHARAN PILLAI.V.S., EMPLOYEE CODE NO.9932, QUARTER NO.314/06, FACT-CD TOWNSHIP, AMBALAMEDU.P.O., KOCHI-682303.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jose Paul.K
- respondent
Sunil Barthewal
- respondent
Andrew Prabu
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court