Mon Joseph v. Dr.Venu.v.Ias
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petitioner informed that sanctioned funds were released promptly; time for remittance extended by one month; matter closed with liberty to approach for non-compliance.
What did the court decide?
Extension of time for remittance of amount to petitioner by one month.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 4TH CHAITHRA, 1941
Con.Case(C).No. 471 of 2019 IN WP(C). 19389/2018
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 19389/2018
PETITIONER:
MON JOSEPH, AGED 45 YEARS S/O. U.E. UTHUPPAN (LATE), OTTATHYCAL HOUSE, NELLICKAMON P.O., RANNI, PATHANAMTHITTA 686 674.
BY ADVS.SRI.J.JULIAN XAVIER SRI.FIROZ K.ROBIN
RESPONDENTS:
1 DR.VENU.V. IAS (FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER), PRESENTLY WORKING AS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MON JOSEPH
- respondent
DR.VENU.V.
- respondent
SRI.P.B. NOOH
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court