In this contempt of court case, the High Court was informed that the petitioner had complied with directives issued in WP(C) 8716/2018 via an order dated 08.03.2019. Finding compliance occurred, albeit belatedly, the court closed the contempt proceeding without further action.
Contempt of court case closed with no further action against the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
WEDNESDAY,THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 29TH PHALGUNA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 347 of 2019 IN WP(C). 8716/2018
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 8716/2018 of HIGHCOURT
PETITIONER/S:
DEEPAK.V. AGED 29 YEARS S/O.VINOD,30/7678B,VADAKKANTHARA ROAD, BIG BAZAR,PALAKKAD.
BY ADVS. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA
RESPONDENT/S:
SMT. RENU AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,PARAKUNNAM, VIDYUDT NAGAR,PALAKKAD-678001.
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI. B VINOD, SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 347 of 2019 IN WP(C). 8716/2018 2
JUDGMENT
This Contempt of Court Case is filed
complaining that the directives contained in the judgment dated 17.07.2018 is not complied with.
Sd/-
SHAJI P.CHALY
JUDGE
Hmh
Con.Case(C).No. 347 of 2019 IN WP(C). 8716/2018 3
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WRIT PETITION @ 8716/2018 DATED 17-7-2018 ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 14/08/2018 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT ANNEXURE A3 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 16-10-2018 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT ANNEXURE A4 TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED 30.10.2018 LEAVING OUT THE EXHIBITS.
RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS: NIL
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt of court case should proceed given the belated compliance with earlier directives by the respondent.
DEEPAK.V.
SMT. RENU
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,PARAKUNNAM
SRI. B VINOD
SHAJI P.CHALY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
