M/S.Damac Holding Pvt. Ltd. v. Geetha R Chandran
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt proceeding instituted for willful non-compliance with a prior judgment directing payment of fees to KSREC. The court closed the contempt case without prejudice, allowing the petitioner to move again after remitting fees.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case was closed without prejudice to the petitioner's right to move the court again after remitting fees.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE 2019 / 5TH ASHADHA, 1941
Con.Case(C).No.301 of 2018 IN WP(C).30261/2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C)No.30261/2017 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 20-09-2017
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC 30261/2017:
M/S.DAMAC HOLDING PVT LTD. 33/2440E, COMPASS, THAMMANAM, ERNAKULAM- 682 032, REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR, C.BALASUBRAMANIAM
BY ADV. SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1&2 IN W.P.(C)NO.30261/2017: GEETHA R CHANDRAN FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,CONVENOR, LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE,SEAPORT - AIRPORT ROAD, ECHAMUKKU,KUNNUMPURAM, THRIKKAKKARA,VAZHAKKALA, KAKKANAD - 682 021.
SRI.C.P.PRADEEP, SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to proceed with contempt proceedings for non-compliance with directions to pay fees.
Whether to allow the petitioner to file another petition after remitting fees.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/s.DAMAC HOLDING PVT LTD
- respondent
GEETHA R CHANDRAN
Coram
P.B.SURESH KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court