Leela.K v. Babu
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Ernakulam delivered an order in a contempt case, noting that the petitioner had been accommodated in the disputed property with assistance from social welfare and police authorities. The court permitted liberty to raise contempt proceedings if directions were violated.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 25TH MAGHA, 1940 Con.Case(C).No. 288 of 2019 IN WP(C). 39107/2018
AGAINST WP(C) 39107/2018 of HIGHCOURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER:
LEELA.K AGED 70 YEARS W/O LATE SHAMBU, RESIDING NEAR SREE KURUMBA BHAGAVATHI TEMPLE, BEKAL, KASARGOD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.SURESH KUMAR KODOTH SRI.K.P.ANTONY BINU
RESPONDENTS:
1 BABU AGED 51 YEARS, S/O LATE SHAMBU, BEKAL PALLIKERA 2ND VILLAGE, NEAR SREE KURUMBA BHAGAVATHI TEMPLE, BEKAL, KASARGOD DISTRICT, PIN-671 318.
2 V K VISHWAMBARAN, AGED 47 YEARS, (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER), WORKING AS STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BEKAL POLICE STATION, KASARGOD DISTRICT, PIN 671 318.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Leela.K
- respondent
Babu
- respondent
V K Vishwambaran
- respondent
Smt.Amminikutty
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court