In a contempt case regarding a writ petition concerning contract workmen regularization, the High Court of Kerala closed the proceeding upon admission after receiving the order passed by the Apex Court, noting that the respondent had decided to include eligible candidates.
The contempt case was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
TUESDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF JUNE 2019 / 14TH JYAISHTA, 1941
Con.Case(C).No. 284 of 2019 IN WP(C). 35164/2018
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 35164/2018 OF HIGHCOURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC:
A. SURESH, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O SWAMI, ALAMPAT HOUSE, KADALUNDI P.O., CALICUT-673 302.
BY ADV. SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT IN WPC:
P.G .UNNIKRISHNAN,
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED, VIDYUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
BY ADV. SMT.ANEETHA A.G., SC, KSEB
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.06.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
COC NO.284/2019
2
JUDGMENT
The learned Standing Counsel made available a copy of the order passed on 25.01.2019 based on the Apex Court judgment. In the light of the said order passed on
25.01.2019, by which the respondent has decided to include petty contract workmen who have passed SSLC also among the eligible candidates to be considered for regularisation in KSEB, the contempt case is closed. Sd/-
P.V.ASHA, JUDGE.
ww
COC NO.284/2019
3
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 14.11.2018 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.(C).35164 OF 2018.
A.SURESH
P.G.UNNIKRISHNAN
P.V.ASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
