Prasanth K., v. Saju George
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt of court case, the Division Bench ordered the closure of the proceeding after noting that the underlying challenge to the Single Judge's judgment had been stayed by a subsequent Division Bench order, rendering the continuing contempt application moot.
What did the court decide?
Continuation of the contempt case is stopped and it is ordered to be closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.HRISHIKESH ROY
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE 2019 / 21ST JYAISHTA, 1941
Con.Case(C).No. 1809 of 2018
FROM THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 32263/2017 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 21.6.2018
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC:
PRASANTH K., AGED 35 YEARS, S/O. VIJAYAN K., PRASANTH NIVAS, PUNNAD P.O., IRITTY, KANNUR - 670 703.
BY ADV. SRI.D.AJITHKUMAR
RESPONDENT/IST RESPONDENT IN WPC:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Prasanth K.
- respondent
Saju George
Coram
Hrishikesh Roy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court