Contempt petition filed for non-compliance of directions. Court accepted Government Pleader's submission of compliance and disposed of the case.
Order that the contempt of court case stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 9TH ASWINA, 1941
Con.Case(C).No.1708 OF 2019 IN WP(C). 27875/2018
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 27875/2018(H) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C.):
P.U.KURIAKOSE
S/O.LATE ULAHANNAN, PALAKKAPRAYIL HOUSE, EDAKKATTUVAYAL DESAM, EDAKKATTUVAYAL VILLAGE, KANAYANNOOR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, NOW RESIDING AT BHOPAL IN THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER P.U.POULOSE, S/O.LATE ULAHANNAN, AGED 57 YEARS, PALAKKAPRAYIL HOUSE, EDAKKATTUVAYAL DESAM, EDAKKATTUVAYAL VILLAGE, KANAYANNOOR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT
BY ADV. K.J.KURIACHAN
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 3, 4, 5 AND 6 IN w.P.(C.):
1 SMT.BEENA P.ANAND, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, (HUSBANDS AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), THE TAHSILDAR, KANAYANNOOR TALUK, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682011.
2 MR.AJAY KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 53,(FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), THE DISTRICT SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD, PIN682030.
3 MRS.LATHA.K.K., AGED ABOUT 48,(HUSBANDS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), THE VILLAGE OFFICER, EDAKKATTUVAYAL VILLAGE, EDAKKATTUVAYAL, PIN-682313.
4 MR.V.A.MUHAMMED SABIR,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, (FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), THE TAHSILDAR, (LAND RECORDS) KANAYANNOOR TALUK, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682011.
R1-4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER
OTHER PRESENT:
Con.Case(C).No.1708 OF 2019
IN WP(C). 27875/2018 2
SRI.SAIGI JACOB PALATTY, SR.GOVT.PLEADER
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.10.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No.1708 OF 2019
IN WP(C). 27875/2018
3
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
Cont.Case (C) No. 1708 of 2019
Dated this the 1st day of October, 2019
JUDGMENT
The above contempt of court case has been filed alleging non compliance of the directions issued by this Court in Annexure-II judgment dated 16.08.2018 rendered by this Court in W.P.(C.) No.27875/2018 filed by the petitioner herein.
Recording the abovesaid submissions on both sides, it is ordered that the above contempt of court case will stand disposed of.
Sd/-
ALEXANDER THOMAS, JUDGE
SKS
Con.Case(C).No.1708 OF 2019
IN WP(C). 27875/2018
4
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE I TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 20.3.2017 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN WPC.NO.9310/2017. ANNEXURE II CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 16.8.2018 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN WPC.NO.27875/2018. ANNEXURE III TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DATED 25.10.2018 ISSUED TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE IV TRUE COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE DATED 30.3.2019 ISSUED TO THE RESPONDENTS. ANNEXURE V POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD EVIDENCING RECEIPT OF ANNEXURE-IV LAWYER NOTICE BY 1ST RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE VI POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD EVIDENCING RECEIPT OF ANNEXURE-IV LAWYER NOTICE BY 2ND RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE VII POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD EVIDENCING RECEIPT OF ANNEXURE-IV LAWYER NOTICE BY 3RD RESPONDENT.
P.U. KURIAN
Mrs. Been a P. Anand (Tahsildar)
Mr. Ajay Kumar (District Survey Superintendent)
Mrs. Latha K.K. (Village Officer)
Mr. V.A. Muhammed Sabir (Tahsildar)
ALEXANDER THOMAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
