Rakhi P.V. v. Rahul R.
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt of court case (Civil), the petitioner's counsel submitted that the directions given to the respondents have been complied with. The Court accepted this submission. The case was closed on the date of hearing.
What did the court decide?
Contempt of court case closed as directions were found compliant.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
MONDAY ,THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 29TH MAGHA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 1274 of 2018 IN WP(C). 30561/2017
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WPC 30561/2017 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/S:
- 1 RAKHI P.V. AGED 36 YEARS, D/O.VIJAYAN, PALLATHUPADY HOUSE, P.O.NAYARAMBALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, KERALA-682 509.
- 2 NISHA K.S.
- AGED 31 YEARS, W/O.SUSASANAN, MEENAMBIKA HOUSE, KARUTHEDATH KALAM, THEKKE DESAM, P.O.NALLEPPILLY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 553.
- 3 REEJAMOL SCARIA AGED 31 YEARS, W/O.SINTO SABU, CHARUVULAYIL HOUSE, P.O.THARIODE NORTH, PADINJARATHARA, WAYANAD-673 575.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rakhi P.V. and others
- respondent
Rahul R.
Coram
Anu Sivaraman
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court