V.V. George v. Sri. G.R.Gokul
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court acquitted the respondents of contempt of court on the grounds that the property in question was taken possession of on 01.04.2018, prior to the interim order dated 13.04.2018. The contempt case was subsequently closed without further proceedings.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case is closed as no violation of the interim order has been established.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF AUGUST 2019 / 11TH SRAVANA, 1941
Con.Case(C).No.1108 of 2018 IN WP(C). 13672/2018
AGAINST THE ORDERT IN WPC 13672/2018 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 13-04-2018
PETITIONER/S:
V.V. GEORGE
AGED 56 YEARS, S/O. VARKEY, VALETHU HOUSE,COLONY ROAD, MUNNAR, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.JOBY JACOB PULICKEKUDY SRI.ANIL GEORGE
RESPONDENT/S:
1 SRI. G.R.GOKUL AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,FATHEER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PAINAVU, IDUKKI 685 603.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether there is a violation of the interim order by the respondents.
Whether the act of taking possession of the property on 01.04.2018 constitutes contempt of court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.V. GEORGE
- respondent
SRI. G.R.GOKUL
- respondent
SRI. P.K SHAJI
- respondent
SRI. JOSEPH SUNNY
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court