A contempt of court case was decided on the same day as its admission. The respondent submitted that they had retained the disputed property in the data bank on 22.07.2019. The court held that there was no reason to pursue the case further given the belated compliance. The contempt case was closed. No orders were issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 20TH AGRAHAYANA, 1941
Con.Case(C).No.1061 OF 2019 IN WP(C). 34415/2018
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 34415/2018(B) DATED 23.10.2018 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/S:
P.V.SUHAS, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O.P.V.KRISHNAN, KRISHNA PADMAM, BEKAL P.O., KASARAGODE.
BY ADVS. SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER (SR.) SRI.BALU TOM SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA
RESPONDENT/S:
ARJITHA, AGED 35 YEARS, W/O.RAMAKRISHNAN, LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, REPRESENTED BY CONVENER/AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, AJANUR P.O., MANIKOTH- 671316.
BY SMT.NISHA BOSE. SR. GP
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.12.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No.1061 OF 2019 2
JUDGMENT
This Contempt of Court case is filed by the petitioner complaining that the directives contained in the judgment dated 23.10.2018 is not complied with.
belatedly directions are complied with, I do not find any reason to pursue the Contempt of Court case any further.
The Contempt of Court case is closed
accordingly.
Sd/-
SHAJI P.CHALY
JUDGE
uu
11.12.2019
Con.Case(C).No.1061 OF 2019 3
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 34415/2018 DATED 23.10.2018.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to continue the contempt of court proceedings where the petitioner complained of non-compliance of earlier directives.
Whether belated compliance with the directives by the respondent warrants closing the contempt case.
P.V. Suhas
Arjitha
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
