The Court allowed the applicant to withdraw the anticipatory bail application due to his being abroad, with liberty to file a fresh application on his return. The application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the application with liberty to file a fresh anticipatory bail application after return to the country.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 18TH ASWINA, 1941
Bail Appl..No.6886 OF 2019
CRIME NO.471/2019 OF Alathur Police Station , Palakkad
PETITIONER/S:
ABDUL LATHEEF, AGED 35 YEARS S/O BASHEER, NOOLIDAMPARA, KUZHALMANNAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.BABY MATHEW
RESPONDENT/S:
R3 BY ADV. A.AMRUTHA VIDYADHARAN R3 BY ADV. SMT.F.ANCY R3 BY ADV. SMT.KALA G.NAMBIAR
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI. T.R.RENJITH, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.10.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
::2::
Bail Appl..No.6886 OF 2019
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J .
B.A.No.6886 Of 2019
Dated this the 10th day of October, 2019.
O R D E R
This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in relation to the involvement of the petitioner as the sole accused in Crime No.471/2019 of Alathur Police Station, Palakkad District, which has been registered for offences punishable under Secs.195A & 506(i) of the I.P.C and Secs.66E and 67A of the I.T.Act.
::3::
Bail Appl..No.6886 OF 2019
Accordingly, it is ordered that leave is accorded to the petitioner to work out his remedies in the manner known to law. With the said liberty, the bail application will stand
dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/ALEXANDER THOMAS, Judge.
bkn/-
Abdul Latheef
State of Kerala
Alexander Thomas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
