Bail application dismissed as withdrawn. The court explicitly stated that the dismissal would not prevent the petitioner from approaching the court again seeking similar relief via an appropriate application.
Bail application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the court again.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2019 / 31ST SRAVANA, 1941
Bail Appl..No.5979 OF 2019
PETITIONER/S/ACCUSED:
JAYAKUMAR C.L @ JIJI AGED 40 YEARS, S/O. KUTTAN, CHERUVIL, PATTITHANAM P.O, ETTUMANOOR, PIN-686631.
BY ADV. SRI.S.SUDHISH KUMAR
RESPONDENT/S/COMPLAINANT:
1 S.I OF POLICE ETTUMANOOR POLICE STATION, ETTUMANOOR, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
2 VIBIN V.M, NIKATHIL HOUSE, NORTH PARAVOOR P.O, ERNAKULAM,
SMT.V.SREEJA,PP
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.08.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Bail Appl..No.5979 OF 2019
2
O R D E R
Dismissed as withdrawn.
However, this order will not stand in the way of the petitioner in approaching this Court again seeking for the same relief by filing appropriate application.
Sd/-
B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
JUDGE
RK/22.08.2019
JAYAKUMAR C.L @ JIJI
VIBIN V.M
SMT.V.SREEJA
B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
