Suhaib v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
On an application for bail under Section 392 read with Section 34 IPC, the court granted bail to the third accused accused of planned robbery.
What did the court decide?
Bail granted on executing a bond of Rs. 60,000 with sureties, surrendering passport, and appearing before the investigating officer on Mondays and Fridays.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
TUESDAY ,THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 30TH MAGHA, 1940
Bail Appl..No. 319 of 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CRMP 142/2019 of JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS ,CHAVAKKAD DATED 11-01-2019
CRIME NO. 1858/2017 OF Kunnamkulam Police Station , Thrissur
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3:
SUHAIB AGED 25 YEARS S/O.SULAIMAN, VATTAMPARAMBIL HOUSE, PAZHUNNANA, CHEMMANTHITTA VILLAGE, THRISSUR.
BY ADV. SRI.D.VIMAL DEV
RESPONDENT:
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, KOCHI-31.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant bail to the petitioner, who is accused of robbery, considering his period of detention abroad and lack of criminal antecedents.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SUHAIB
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
SUNIL THOMAS
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court