Nihal P., v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant in a bail petition under the NDPS Act sought permission to withdraw the application. The High Court dismissed the application as withdrawn without adjudicating on the merits.
The applicant in a bail petition under the NDPS Act sought permission to withdraw the application. The High Court dismissed the application as withdrawn without adjudicating on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
FRIDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF JUNE 2019 / 17TH JYAISHTA, 1941
Bail Appl..No. 180 of 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CRMP 1203/2018 of SPECIAL COURT (NDPS ACT CASES), VADAKARA DATED 07-12-2018
CRIME NO. 303/2018 OF Thamarassery Police Station, Kozhikode
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
NIHAL P., AGED 23 YEARS, S/O ASHIQUE, MOROTH PARAMBA HOUSE, BAITHUL HAMDA, KARUVISSERI P.O., KARAPARAMBA, KOZHIKODE.
BY ADVS. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU (SR.) SMT.POOJA PANKAJ SRI.AJEESH K.SASI SRI.M.REVIKRISHNAN SRI.P.M.RAFIQ SRI.THOMAS J.ANAKKALLUNKAL SRI.V.C.SARATH SRI.VIPIN NARAYAN SRUTHY N. BHAT
RESPONDENT:
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY S.H.O. THAMARASSERI POLICE STATION, THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. AJITH MURALI
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.06.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
B.A.180/2019
2
ORDER
When the matter was taken up, the learned counsel appearing
for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this application. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V., JUDGE
krj
Nihal P.
State of Kerala
Raja Vijayaraghavan V.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court