Murali, v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners accused of criminal offences. The court held that custodial interrogation was not necessary given the nature of the case and awarded an order under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
What did the court decide?
Petitioners released on bail on executing a bond of Rs.40,000 each with two solvent sureties each, subject to reporting conditions.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF APRIL 2019/15TH CHAITHRA,1941
Bail Appl..No. 1331 of 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CRMC 192/2019 of DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT,KOLLAM DATED 12-02-2019
CRIME NO. 16/2019 OF Kollam East Police Station, Kollam
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED:
1 MURALI, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O. RAJAN, SUSHAS, ARA-198, KALIKULANGARA NORTH WARD, KOLLAM 691 522.
2 SHILPA,
AGED 32 YEARS, D/O. LATE RADHAKRISHNAN, RESIDING AT RAJ BHAVAN, AZHOOR, CHIRAYINKEEZHU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM .
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners accused of offences under various sections of IPC.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Murali
- petitioner
Shilpa
- respondent
State
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court