The High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam dismissed an appeal for default due to non-compliance with directions and absence of the appellant's counsel on the hearing date.
Appeal dismissed for default due to absence of counsel and failure to take fresh steps.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH
MONDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA, 1941
AS.No.106 OF 1998(A)
AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A NO.884/1967 IN OS NO.12/1964 DATED 16-011996 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, PALAKKAD.
SUPPL.RESPONDENTS 80, TO 82 IN I.A NO.884/67/APPELLANTS:
1. RAMANKUTTY.K.C. KOLAPPADOM, KUNISSERRY AMSOM, ALATHUR TALUK.
2. LAKSHMANAN, KOLAPPADOM, KUNISSERRY AMSOM, ALATHUR TALUK.
3. SWAMINATHAN, KOLAPPADOM, KUNISSERRRY AMSOM, ALATHUR TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI.V.V.ASOKAN (SR.) SMT.JIJIMOL J.VADAKKEN
PETITIONERS 1 TO 3 & RESPONDENTS 1 TO 6, 8 TO 32, 34 TO 79 & 83/RESPONDENTS:
1 BALAMANI AMMA, RESIDING AT KALLAYILKKALAM,MANAPATTA,KUNISSERRY, AMSOM & DESOM, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
KALLAYILKKALAM,KUNISSERRY,PALAKKAD.
RESIDING AT KALLAYILKKALAM,KUNISSERRY AMSOM & DESOM, ALATHUR TALUK.
AS.No.106 OF 1998 2
AS.No.106 OF 1998 3
34 CHANDRASEKHARAN NAIR, RESIDING AT KALLAYILKALAM,KUNISSERRY,PALAKKAD
AS.No.106 OF 1998 4
AS.No.106 OF 1998 5
TATA IRON & STEEL CO., JAMSHEDPUR,BIHAR.
S/O.PANKUNNI, RESIDING AT KALLAYIL,KUNISSERRY AMSOM, ALATHUR TALUK.
AS.No.106 OF 1998 6
76 MEENAKSHYKUTTY W/O.LATE LAKSHMANAN NAIR, RESIDING AT KALLAYIL,KUNISSERRY, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD.
77 MEENAKSHIKUTTY
W/O.LATE BHASKARAN NAIR, RESIDING AT KUNISSERRY AMSOM, ALATHUR TALUK.
78 MEENA, D/O.LATE BHASKARAN NAIR,RESIDING AT KUNISSERRY AMSOM, ALATHUR TALUK.
79 KUTTAN, S/O.LATE BHASKARAN NAIR, RESIDING AT KALLAYIL,KUNISSERRY AMSOM, ALATHUR TALUK.
R57,59,65,28,30,31,60 BY ADV. SMT.M.LALITHA NAIR R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.RAVINDRAN SR. R13,35,40 BY ADV. SRI.H.SIVARAMAN
THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09.12.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
AS.No.106 OF 1998 7
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 9th day of December 2019
Fresh steps not taken. Despite direction repeatedly, steps are not taken. There was no representation for the last two occasions. This time also, there is no representation from the counsel for the appellant.
In the event, the appeal stands dismissed for default.
Sd/-
MARY JOSEPH
JUDGE
JJ
Ramankutty.K.C. Kolappadom
Lakshmanan
Swaminathan
Balamani Amma
Syama Sunder
Mary Joseph
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
