Sheena v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The single judge closed the writ petition after the 4th respondent produced a marriage registration certificate, confirming the petitioner's union.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was closed recording the registration of the marriage.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. NARAYANA PISHARADI
TUESDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 / 17TH ASWINA, 1940
WP(Crl.).No. 359 of 2018
PETITIONER:
SHEENA
AGED 36 YEARS D/O VELAYUDHAN, NALAMKULANGARA, MULANJUR, MULANJOOR OTTAPPALAM (PO), PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-676951.
BY ADV. SRI.N.SATHEESH KUMAR(NEMMARA)
RESPONDENTS:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be closed upon production of the Marriage Certificate.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SHEENA
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF (SP RURAL), MALAPPURAM
- respondent
CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHANGEARAMKULAM
- respondent
AJEESH
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court