and 12 links width was provided in the presence of the Additional Tahsildar on 16.10.2004. However, barricade was created and the way was reduced to 1.50 mts. width. Furthermore, in Ext.P4 common judgment delivered by this Court dated 20.08.2007, it is held that, it shall be open to the parties to agree for a convenient alignment of the pathway ensuring 12 links width with a view to minimise the inconvenience, if any, experienced by respondents 3 to 5 in the enjoyment of their adjacent property. Therefore, it is clear that, liberty was given to the respondents to provide a convenient way so as to avoid any inconveniences. Ext.P4 judgment has become final and conclusive. Therefore, when Ext.P10 order is passed by the 1st respondent, the 1st respondent has taken into account the aforesaid observations made by this Court and has directed that the petitioners have the right to get the pathway extended to 12 links and therefore, the preliminary order dated 01.09.2008 is made absolute, and directed respondents 3 to 5 to remove the obstructions made in the pathway within 15 days from the date of receipt of the order.
