Disposed

Nandan.P. v. the Secretary

Kerala HC19 Dec 2018WP(C)/41406/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the Regional Transport Authority to consider the petitioner's request for revising stage carriage timings by convening a timing conference within six weeks, with notice to the petitioner and other enroute operators.

What did the court decide?

Director the respondent to consider Ext.P3 request for revision of timings via a timing conference within six weeks, giving notice to the petitioner and other enroute operators.

Nandan.P. Vs the Secretary — Service and Employment | Kerala HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2018 / 28TH AGRAHAYANA, 1940

¶5

WP(C).No. 41406 of 2018

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

NANDANAN.P.,

¶8

S/O. ACHUTHAN, VAIDYAR, PULLANIKKATTIL HOUSE, KOZHIKKOTTIRI P.O., MUTHUTHALA, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD

¶9

BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON

¶10

RESPONDENT:

¶11

THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD-678 001

¶12

SMT C.S.SHEEJA, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER

¶13

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19.12.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WPC 41406 OF 2018

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is a stage carriage operator on

¶18

the route Shornur-Karakkad-Guruvayur in respect of stage carriage bearing registration No.KL-46/P-306. The timing in respect of the basic vehicle bearing registration No.KL-07/AR-8114 was last settled as per Ext.P2 proceedings dated 14.12.2015 of the respondent. The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent to consider Ext.P3 request dated 07.12.2018 for revision of timings in respect of

¶19

his stage carriage after giving an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and other affected operators.

¶20

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner

¶21

and also the learned Senior Government Pleader

¶22

appearing for the respondent.

¶23

Since Ext.P3 request made by the petitioner

¶24

is pending consideration before the respondent,

¶25

WPC 41406 OF 2018 3

¶26

this writ petition is disposed of, without going into the merits of the case, by directing the respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3 request made by the petitioner for revision of timings in respect of her stage carriage, strictly in accordance with law, with notice to the petitioner and also other enroute operators, after convening a timing conference, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

¶27

Sd/-

¶28

ANIL K. NARENDRAN JUDGE

WPC 41406 OF 2018

APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

¶34

EXHIBIT P1	TRUE COPY OF PETITIONER	THE	PERMIT OF THE
EXHIBIT P2	TRUE COPY OF 14.12.2015	THE	PROCEEDINGS SIGNED ON
EXHIBIT P3	TRUE COPY OF 07.12.2018	THE	REQUEST DATED

¶35

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:NIL

¶36

TRUE COPY

¶37

P.A. TO JUDGE

Nandan.P. v. the Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nandan.P. v. the Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.S. Nazar Vs the Muvattupuzha Primary Co-Operative Agricultural & Rural

The Calicut City Service Co-Op Bank Ltd. Vs State of Kerala

Sheeja J.Nair Vs State of Kerala

M. Gangadharan, Vs the Secretary

P.Raveendran Vs the Secretary

Shaji P.K Vs the Chairman and Managing Director