Viji v. the Deputy Tahsildar (Revenue Recovery)
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed the present writ petition without prejudice as withdrawn by the petitioner, who had already preferred appeals against the relevant award.
This court dismissed the present writ petition without prejudice as withdrawn by the petitioner, who had already preferred appeals against the relevant award.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 14TH PHALGUNA, 1939
WP(C).No. 364 of 2018
PETITIONER(S)
VIJI, AGED 34 YEARS, W/O.VENU, KRISHNAPRABHA, CHEMBUMMOOLA, MUDAPURAM, KOLLICHIRA, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.GEORGE SEBASTIAN SRI.K.RAJENDRAN CHETTIAR
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY), TALUK OFFICE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, AZHOOR VILLAGE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 004.
3. THE NEW INDIAN INSURANCE COMPANY, GOVT. PRESS ROAD, STATUE JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY MANAGER- 695 001.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-03-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Msd.
06/03/2018
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, J.
----------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.364 of 2018
Dated this the 5th day of March, 2018
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 1 and 2 to keep in abeyance all further proceedings in pursuance of Exts.P1 and P2 for a period of 3 months.
W.P.(C)No.364 of 2018
:-2-:
(MV)Nos.551/2004, 620/2004, 550/2004 and 839/2004.
In such circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to seek appropriate interim relief in those appeals.
Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
All pending interlocutory applications are closed.
Sd/-
ANIL K.NARENDRAN JUDGE
ami/5.3.18
//True copy//
P.A.to Judge
Viji
The Deputy Tahsildar (Revenue Recovery)
The Village Officer
The New Indian Insurance Company
Anil K.Narendran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court