Disposed

S. Rajasekharan Pillai v. Travancore Devaswom Board

Kerala HC13 Sept 2018WP(C)/28553/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition concerned the transfer of a petitioner-peon from Kollam to Kottarakkara. The court disposed of the petition, directing the 1st respondent to consider the appeal (Ext.P7) and pass orders within a month, allowing the petitioner to continue in the same station till then.

What did the court decide?

Directing the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P7 appeal and pass orders within one month; petitioner allowed to continue in the same station.

S. Rajasekharan Pillai Vs Travancore Devaswom Board — Service and Employment | Kerala HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

¶4

THURSDAY ,THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2018 / 22ND BHADRA, 1940

¶5

WP(C).No. 28553 of 2018-T

¶6

PETITIONER/S:

¶7

S. RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI AGED 55 YEARS S/O SANKARA PILLAI,WORKING AS 'PEON' ASSISTANT DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE,KOLLAM, PIN 691001 RESIDING AT KUNNATRADIL HOUSE, KULANGARABHAGOM,CHAVARA P.O,KOLLAM DISTRICT 691583

¶8

BY ADV. SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND

¶9

RESPONDENT/S:

¶10

1 TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,NANTHANCODE,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001

¶11

2 THE DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001

¶12

3 THE ASSISTANT DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, KOLLAM 691001

¶13

4 THE ASSISTANT DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD,KOTTARAKARA 691506

¶14

BY ADV. SRI.C.K.PAVITHRAN, SC, TDB

¶15

OTHER PRESENT:

¶16

SRI.K.SASIKUMAR,SC,TDB

¶17

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13.09.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

P.V.ASHA, J.

¶19

W.P.(C) No.28553 of 2018-T

¶20

Dated this the 13^th day of September, 2018

¶21

JUDGMENT

¶22

Aggrieved by the transfer from Kollam to Kottarakkara the petitioner has filed Ext.P7 appeal before the 1^st respondent.

¶23

In view of the above circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the 1^st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P7 appeal produced along with IA No.2 of 2018 within a period of one month. Till such time the petitioner shall be allowed to continue in the same station.

Sd/-

P.V.ASHA

JUDGE

rkc

WPC NO.28553/18

APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶31

EXHIBIT P1		TRUE COPY OF ORDER ROC NO.90/16/ESST.(B) DATED 5/10/2016 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2		TRUE COPY OF 0RDER ROC NO.24/18/ESST.B DATED 22.8.2018 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P3		TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 29.11.2013 IN WPC NO.24447/2013 OF HON'BLE COURT.
EXHIBIT P4		TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION ROC NO.17751/18/P.IO.DATED 28.7.2018 ISSUED BY THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER
EXHIBIT P5		TRUE COPY OF PROCEEDINGS ROC NO.3626/08/ESST.1 DATED 24.1.2011 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P6		TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 23.8.2018 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P7		TRUE COOPY OF APPEAL DT.7.9.18 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT
RESPONDENTS'	EXHIBITS	: NIL

S. Rajasekharan Pillai v. Travancore Devaswom Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S. Rajasekharan Pillai v. Travancore Devaswom Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Manager, T.E.M.v.H.S.S., Mylode Vs Sreekala K.S.

Leema Das Vs K.F.C.

K.R.Viswanathan Vs Chief Security Commissioner

Subramanian Chankuthodiel Vs Moorkanadu Grama Panchayat

Rajesh K Vs the State of Kerala

K.Balachandran Vs Cochin Devaswom Board