has repelled similar contentions raised by similarly situated land owners and has dismissed those W.P.(C)s. However, this Court specifically directed therein that the land owners concerned will be entitled to receive compensation benefits in the acquisition process in terms of the provisions contained as per schedules 1, 2 and 3 of the Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act, 2013, as amended, even though the acquisition proceedings have been initiated under the National Highway Act, 1956. This Court has clearly held that it will not be right and proper for this Court to exercise judicial review remedy in public law so as to interdict the present land acquisition proceedings on the basis of available pleadings and materials on record and going by the yardstick and norms well established in a series of rulings of the Apex Court and various High Courts, especially in the matter of acquisition under the National Highway Act, 1956. Those aspects are dealt with in detail in the abovesaid common judgment dated 19.11.2018 in W.P. (C).No. 30167/2018 and connected cases. Though feeble plea of mala fides has been brought to the notice of this Court, no substantial materials have been made available before this Court to hold that there is any overwhelming and manifest malafides, which vitiate the
