Subashini v. Tahsildar (Lr)
Case brief
What is this about?
This writ petition challenged the Tahsildar's order refusing survey and mutation on the grounds of tenant occupancy. The court disposed of the petition by directing the Revenue Divisional Officer to consider the appeal, grant a hearing, and pass orders within three months.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
MONDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2018 / 8TH SRAVANA, 1940
WP(C).No. 25430 of 2018
PETITIONER:
SUBASHINI, D/O.BHARGAVAN VALIYAVEEDU, KADAKKAVUR PANCHAYAT, WARD NO.7, CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV.SRI.R.ANILKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
1. TAHSILDAR (LR), TALUK OFFICE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 101. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 695001. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001. 4. PADMINI, W/O.SURESHKUMAR, KIZHAKKE CHERUMANI VEEDU, KADAKKAVUR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO R3 BY SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED ANZAR K.J THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-07-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Tahsildar is justified in refusing survey and mutation proceedings while a tenant occupies the property.
Whether the Revenue Divisional Officer has been directed to consider the appeal regarding survey and mutation with a hearing.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SUBASHINI, D/O.BHARGAVAN VALIYAVEEDU
- respondent
TAHSILDAR (LR), TALUK OFFICE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU
- respondent
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
PADMINI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court