issued as early as on 22.1.1975 it has become functuous officio and if the petitioner has any grievance regarding the wrong mentioning of survey number, it is for him to approach the appellate authority, who has to entertain the appeal as per the decision of the Land Tribunal. This aspect is mentioned in Ext.P-5. Earlier, the 1st respondentTahsildar, Udumbanchola, who had made a detailed examination of various aspects of the matter as found in para 2 of Ext.P-3 dated 15.7.2017 that as per the present BTR, survey number of the present property is seen as 14/1, whereas the title deeds of the said property as per Ext.P-1 and Ext.P-2 purchase certificate, etc., have shown the survey Number as 40/14. It is also stated by the 1st respondent in para 2 of Ext.P-3 that on examination of litho map and block map as well as inspection of the land, the land is seen included in old survey No.40, etc. However, towards the final paragraph of Ext.P-3, the 1st respondent has observed that unless he get a specific direction from the superior authority, he may not be in a position to take necessary action to consider and finalise the request of the petitioner for correction of old survey number 40/14 instead of the present survey number shown in BTR as 14/1. Since it is clearly stated in Ext.P-3 that litho map and block map as well as the local inspection of the land have disclosed that
