Dismissed

Subitha Sudhher M v. Mahatma Gandhi University

Kerala HC11 Dec 2018WP(C)/16174/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought degree certificates for B.Sc Computer Application-Triple Main after passing out. The Court noted inability to prove registration for Triple Main due to lack of prospectus/evidence. Thus, petitioners must claim certificate per actual registration.

What did the court decide?

None; court disposed of petition noting petitioners can claim certificate per actual registration with University.

Subitha Sudhher M Vs Mahatma Gandhi University — Education and Admissions | Kerala HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2018 / 20TH AGRAHAYANA, 1940

¶5

WP(C).No.16174 of 2015

¶6

PETITIONERS:

¶7

1 SUBITHA SUDHEER.M., AGED 24 YEARS, W/O.PRASANTH P.S., MATTAKKAL HOUSE, CHERAI P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-683 514.

¶8

2 DEEPTHY G.S. KARTHIKA, CHIRAKKONATH ROAD, IRUMPANANGADU P.O,

¶9

EZHUKONE, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691 505.

¶10

3 APARNA ASOKAN R. AGED 23 YEARS D/O.ASHOKAN R.R., RAMANKULATH HOUSE, HOUSE NO.14/520A, THOPPUMPADI, CHULLICKAL, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682005.

¶11

BY ADVS. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR (SENIOR.) SRI.MANOJ RAMASWAMY

¶12

RESPONDENTS:

¶13

1 MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY BUILDINGS, PRIYADARSINI HILLS P.O, KOTTAYAM-686 560.

¶14

2 THE VICE CHANCELLOR MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM-686 001.

¶15

3 THE PRINCIPAL ST.TERESA'S COLLEGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682011.

¶16

4 THE PRINCIPAL SACRED HEART COLLEGE, THEVARA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682013.

¶17

5 THE SECRETARY KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, THULASI HILLS, PATTOM PALACE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA-695 004.

¶18

W.P.(C) No.16174/2015

¶19

¶20

6 THE DISTRICT OFFICER, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, DISTRICT OFFICE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-11.

¶21

7 THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ECONOMICS & STATISTICS, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 2. BY ADVS. SRI.ASOK M.CHERIAN, SC, M.G. UNIVERSITY SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, KPSC SRI.KURIAN GEORGE KANNANTHANAM (SENIOR.) SRI.TONY GEORGE KANNANTHANAM SRI.THOMAS GEORGE

¶22

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11.12.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶23

W.P.(C) No.16174/2015

¶24

¶25

J U D G M E N T

¶26

The petitioners joined B.Sc course for the period 2018-2011 in 3^rd and 4^th respondent colleges. According to the petitioners, the course they joined was B.Sc Computer Application-Triple Main. They passed out the examination and applied for degree certificate in B.Sc Computer Application-Triple Main. The University rejected their applications stating that the course structure was a Single Main Computer Application with two additional subjects; Statistics and Mathematics and therefore, the certificate as requested by the petitioners cannot be issued.

¶27

This Court, on 25.07.2018, passed the following order:

¶28

“The petitioners claim that they joined 'B.Sc Computer Applications-Triple Main based on the prospectus issued by respondents 3 and 4. According to the University, the petitioners registered for 'B.Sc Computer Application Course'. In such circumstances, it is appropriate that respondents 3 and 4 to make available the copy of the affiliation granted by the University for admitting the students like petitioners. Respondents 3 and 4 shall comply with this order by next posting...”

¶29

Learned counsel appearing for the college would submit that

¶30

they are unable to trace out the prospectus. The petitioners also are unable to produce the prospectus.

¶31

W.P.(C) No.16174/2015

¶32

¶33

It is to be noted that the University changed the pattern as B.Sc Computer Application-Triple Main only from 2009 and the petitioners were admitted in 2008. This Court cannot find that the registration of the petitioners was for B.Sc Computer Application-Triple Main, in the absence of any materials produced before this Court. Therefore, the petitioners can only claim certificate in accordance with the registration with the University. If the petitioners have been deceived

¶34

by the colleges, they are at liberty to seek relief in appropriate forum as against the colleges.

¶35

This writ petition is disposed of as above.

¶36

Sd/-

¶37

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

¶38

JUDGE

¶39

smp

¶40

W.P.(C) No.16174/2015

¶41

¶42

APPENDIX

¶43

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶44

EXHIBIT P1	TRUE COPY OF THE M.SC DEGREE CERTIFICATES OF THE 1ST PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P1(a)	TRUE COPY OF THE M.SC DEGREE CERTIFICATES OF THE 2ND PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P1(b)	TRUE COPY OF THE M.SC DEGREE CERTIFICATES OF THE 3RD PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P2	TRUE COPY OF THE DEGREE CERTIFICATES IN B.SC COMPUTER APPLICATION ISSUED TO 1ST PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P2(a)	TRUE COPY OF THE DEGREE CERTIFICATES IN B.SC COMPUTER APPLICATION ISSUED TO 2ND PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P2(b)	TRUE COPY OF THE DEGREE CERTIFICATES IN B.SC COMPUTER APPLICATION ISSUED TO 3RD PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P3	TRUE COPY OF THE COURSE STRUCTURE FOR COMPUTER APPLICATIONS ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P4	TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.U.O.NO.AC.AIII/2/501/2001 DATED 23-4-2003 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P5	TRUE COPY OF THE HALL TICKETS ISSUED TO THE 3RD PETITIONER IN THE YEAR 2009.
EXHIBIT P5(a)	TRUE COPY OF THE HALL TICKETS ISSUED TO THE 3RD PETITIONER IN THE YEAR 2010.
EXHIBIT P5(b)	TRUE COPY OF THE HALL TICKETS ISSUED TO THE 3RD PETITIONER IN THE YEAR 2011.
EXHIBIT P6	TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION VIDE CATEGORY NO.253/2011 PUBLISHED IN MATHRUBHUMI THOZHILVARTHA DATED 20-08-2011.
EXHIBIT P7	TRUE COPY OF THE ADMISSION TICKET ISSUED TO 1ST PETITIONER

¶45

W.P.(C) No.16174/2015

¶46

¶47

EXHIBIT P7(a)	TRUE COPY OF 2ND PETITIONE	THE R	ADMISSION TICKET ISSUED TO
EXHIBIT P7(b)	TRUE COPY OF 3RD PETITIONE	THE R	ADMISSION TICKET ISSUED TO
EXHIBIT P8	TRUE COPY OF 11-7-2014 BY	THE THE	NOTIFICATION DATED 6TH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P9	TRUE COPY OF	THE	RANK LIST
EXHIBIT P10	TRUE COPY OF VII(2)3258/20 THE 1ST PETIT	THE 13 ION	COMMUNICATION NO.E DATED 17-4-2015 ISSUED TO ER BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P10(a)	TRUE COPY OF VII(2)3258/20 THE 2ND PETIT	THE 13 ION	COMMUNICATION NO.E DATED 17-4-2015 ISSUED TO ER BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P10(b)	TRUE COPY OF VII(2)3258/20 THE 3RD PETIT	THE 13 ION	COMMUNICATION NO.E DATED 17-4-2015 ISSUED TO ER BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P11	TRUE COPY OF SUBMITTED BY 2ND RESPONDEN	THE THE T.	APPLICATION DATED 22-4-2015 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE
EXHIBIT P11(a)	TRUE COPY OF SUBMITTED BY 2ND RESPONDEN	THE THE T.	APPLICATION DATED 22-4-2015 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE
EXHIBIT P11(b)	TRUE COPY OF SUBMITTED BY 2ND RESPONDEN	THE THE T.	APPLICATION DATED 22-4-2015 3RD PETITIONER BEFORE THE
EXHIBIT P12	TRUE COPY OF SUBMITTED BY 2ND RESPONDEN	THE THE T.	REQUEST DATED 16-4-2015 3RD RESPONDENT BEFORE THE
EXHIBIT P12(a)	TRUE COPY OF SUBMITTED BY 2ND RESPONDEN	THE THE T.	REQUEST DATED 16-4-2015 3RD RESPONDENT BEFORE THE
EXHIBIT P13	TRUE COPY OF SUBMITTED BY 2ND RESPONDEN	THE THE T.	REQUEST DATED 12-4-2015 4TH RESPONDENT BEFORE THE

¶48

W.P.(C) No.16174/2015

¶49

¶50

EXHIBIT P14 TRUE COPY OF THE MEMO NO.2711/AV/2/OTHER CERTIFICATE/2015/AC DATED 11-5-2015 ISSUED TO 1ST PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P14(a) TRUE COPY OF THE MEMO NO.2711/AV/2/OTHER CERTIFICATE/2015/AC DATED 11-5-2015 ISSUED TO 2ND PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P14(b) TRUE COPY OF THE MEMO NO.2711/AV/2/OTHER CERTIFICATE/2015/AC DATED 11-5-2015 ISSUED TO 3RD PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P15 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE AND GRADE CARD ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO SMT.SANIA CORREYA. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT R1(a) TRUE COPY OF U.O No.AC.AIII/2/501/2001 DTD.23.4.2003. EXHIBIT R1(b) TRUE COPY OF U.O No.AC.AIII/2/1243/97 DTD.19.2.1998. EXHIBIT R1(c) TRUE COPY OF U.O No.AC.AV/1/644/UGC/01 DTD.31.5.2002. EXHIBIT R1(d) TRUE COPY OF U.O No.AC.AIII/2/1246/97 DTD.16.2.98.

¶51

True Copy

¶52

P.S to Judge

¶53

smp

Subitha Sudhher M v. Mahatma Gandhi University

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subitha Sudhher M v. Mahatma Gandhi University

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sreejith.S Vs State of Kerala

Anish I Vs Mahatma Gandhi University

Indu P.V. Vs State of Kerala

V.M.Kutty Moosa Vs T.U.John

Rasitha C.H Vs State of Kerala

Kamalam Vs the State of Kerala