Disposed

Ravi M.K. v. the State of Kerala

Kerala HC14 Sept 2018WP(C)/12069/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The writ petition challenging denial of promotion was disposed of as the petitioner had obtained promotion order pending litigation. Court directed him to seek retrospective promotion separately.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of on the supposition that the petitioner had obtained promotion; directed to approach authorities for retrospective promotion or take up matter subsequently.

Ravi M.K. Vs the State of Kerala — Company and Corporate | Kerala HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

¶4

FRIDAY ,THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2018 / 23RD BHADRA, 1940

¶5

WP(C).No. 12069 of 2018-G

¶6

PETITIONER/S:

¶7

RAVI M.K.

¶8

AGED 49 YEARS, S/O.KUNJOLE, ASARIKUDY HOUSE,ANJOORMUNDOOR P O,PUTTEKKARA, THRISSUR-680541

¶9

BY ADV. SMT.T.B.REMANI

¶10

RESPONDENT/S:

¶11

1 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,AGRICULTURAL DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695023.

¶12

2 THE KERALA STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,HEAD OFFICE, P.B.NO.1727, WAREHOUSING CORPORATION ROAD, KOCHI682016.

¶13

3 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KERALA STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION,HEAD OFFICE, P B NO.1727, WAREHOUSING CORPORATION ROAD, KOCHI-682016.

¶14

4 THE CHAIRMAN KERALA STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION,HEAD OFFICE, P.B.NO.1727, WAREHOUSING CORPORATION ROAD, KOCHI682016.

¶15

5 K.P.USHA ASSISTANT ENGINEER,KERALA STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION,CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT,HEAD OFFICE, P.B.NO.1727, WAREHOUSING CORPORATION ROAD, KOCHI682016.

¶16

WP(C).No. 12069 of 2018-G

¶17

6 K.T.KUTTAN OVERSEER GRADE I,KERALA STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION, CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, HEAD OFFICE, P.B.NO.1727, WAREHOUSING CORPORATION ROAD, KOCHI-682016.

¶18

BY ADVS. SRI.MAJNU KOMATH, SC, K.S.W.C. SRI.RON BASITAN, GP

¶19

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14.09.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶20

P.V.ASHA, J. ---------------------------W.P.(C) No.12069 of 2018 - G ---------------------------Dated this the 14^th day of September, 2018

¶21

JUDGMENT

¶22

The writ petition was filed aggrieved by the denial of promotion to the petitioner as Assistant Engineer. During the pendency of the writ petition the petitioner has been promoted as Assistant Engineer with effect from 03.10.2017, though the petitioner has claimed promotion with effect from 01.06.2016. The writ petition is disposed of in the light of the order dated 26.07.2018 granting promotion to the petitioner. The petitioner will be free to approach the authorities for retrospective promotion or to take up the matter subsequently if he so chooses.

¶23

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

P.V.ASHA

JUDGE

rkc

W.P.(C) No.12069/18

:4:

APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶32

EXHIBIT P1	TRUE COPY 7.01.1999	OF THE OF THE	PROCEEDINGS DATED THIRD RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P2	TRUE COPY 19.6.2006	OF THE OF THE	PROCEEDINGS DATED 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3	TRUE COPY RESPONDENT 2ND TIME B PETITIONER	OF THE DATED OUND HI .	PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD 26.02.2016 GRANTING GHER GRADE TO THE
EXHIBIT P4	TRUE COPY TO THE 4TH	OF THE RESPON	REPRESENTATION GIVEN DENT DATED 09.03.2017
EXHIBIT P5	TRUE COPY ISSUED BY	OF THE THE 3RD	LETTER DATED 16.8.2017 RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P6	TRUE COPY ISSUED BY	OF THE THE 3RD	LETTER DATED 15.9.2017 RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P7	TRUE COPY 16.10.2017	OF THE .	REPRESENTATION DATED
EXHIBIT P8	TRUE COPY THE PETITI INFORMATIO	OF THE ONER'S N ACT.	APPLICATION MADE BY WIFE UNDER RIGHT
EXHIBIT P8(A)	TRUE COPY TO EXT P8.	OF THE	REPLY DATED 14.11.2017
EXHIBIT P9	TRUE COPY 11.12.2017	OF THE .	APPEAL DATED
EXHIBIT P9(A)	TRUE COPY AUTHORITY	OF REPL DATED 5	Y OF THE APPELLATE .1.2018
EXHIBIT P10	A TRUE COP 20.1.2018.	Y OF TH	E REPLY DATED

Ravi M.K. v. the State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi M.K. v. the State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subramanian Chankuthodiel Vs Moorkanadu Grama Panchayat

Rajesh K Vs the State of Kerala

K.Balachandran Vs Cochin Devaswom Board

D.Lathika Vs State of Kerala

Jayasree J.R. Vs State of Kerala

Manoj Sebastian Vs State of Kerala