Rugmini v. C.D.Bobby
Case brief
What is this about?
This Writ Appeal was disposed of short of merits. The Court held that the primary contentions regarding maintainability were not heard by the Single Judge earlier. The appropriate remedy for any grievance was directed towards seeking a review before the Single Judge.
What did the court decide?
The appeal disposed of with liberty to seek review of the impugned single judge order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
- THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ANTONY DOMINIC
- & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 21ST PHALGUNA, 1939
WA.No.597 of 2018 IN WPC.2085/2018
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C)2085/2018 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 07-02-2018
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 4 TO 6:
1 RUGMINI AGED 59 YEARS, W/O.BALAKRISHNAN, 'VISHNUKRIPA', LAL NAGAR, PUDUPPARIYARAM. P.O, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 731
2 MANIKANDAN, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O.RAVEENDRAN, AMMATH HOUSE, HARINAGAR, SEETHARAM MILL LANE, POONKUNNAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 002 3 DIVYA BALAKRISHNAN, AGED 27 YEARS, D/O. BALAKRISHNAN,'VISHNUKRIPA', LAL NAGAR, PUDUPPARIYARAM. P.O, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 731
BY ADVS.SRI.B.PREMNATH (E) SRI.MANI GOVINDA MARAR
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rugmini
- appellant
Manikandan
- appellant
Divya Balakrishnan
- respondent
Rugmini
- respondent
State of Kerala
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court