Icici Bank v. Sajeev.T.R
Case brief
What is this about?
Two-judge bench disposed of a writ appeal challenging an order releasing a vehicle to a car loan defaulter. The court modified the order, requiring payment of three installments instead of one before release.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 2ND PHALGUNA, 1939 WA.No. 258 of 2018 IN WPC. 1279/2018
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 1279/2018 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 16-01-2018
APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENT
ICICI BANK, PUSHPAMANGALAM ESTATE, NH BYEPASS, EDAPALLY, ERNAKULAM, PIN -682024, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER (LEGAL).
BY ADVS.SRI.A.A.ZIYAD RAHMAN SRI.LAL K.JOSEPH SRI.V.S.SHIRAZ BAVA
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER:
SAJEEV T.R., S/O.RAJAPPAN, THRIKKAKARAKUNNEL HOUSE, NAGAPPUZHA P.O., KALLOORKADU, ERNAKULAM, PIN-686668.
BY SRI.M.V.RAJENDRAN NAIR
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-02-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
ICICI Bank, Pushpamangalam Estate
- respondent
Sajeev T.R.
Coram
Antony Dominic
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court