paragraph 5 of the reply affidavit, the petitioner has averred that after Ext.P2 rank list was published, the bank took steps to fill up 03 vacancies of Peons and thereupon a person with disability filed W.P. (C).No.18708 of 2014 in this court complaining about the nonreservation of posts for persons with disability. During the hearing, learned senior counsel for the writ petitioner submitted that W.P. (C)No.18705 of 2014 was allowed by judgment delivered on 15.09.2015 and the appellant bank was directed to appoint the petitioner therein in the vacancy that arose on 18.02.2014, that when the said direction was not complied with, the petitioner in W.P. (C)No.18705 of 2014 filed Contempt of Court Case No.1232 of 2014 and after the said case was filed, the petitioner in W.P.(C).No.18708 of 2014, a person with 45% physical disability, was appointed as Peon. Learned senior counsel submitted that as one person with disability has been appointed, the stipulation regarding reservation of vacancies for persons with disability stands complied with and therefore, the appellant bank cannot any longer contend for the position that the vacancy of Junior Clerk which arose on 18.02.2014 is one reserved to be filled up by appointing persons with disability and consequently the writ petitioner cannot claim that vacancy.
