This order dismisses a writ appeal against an earlier order in WPC 11744/2015. The court held that the appellant was not interested in pursuing the matter and proceeded without serving notice on the eighth respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.HRISHIKESH ROY
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 8TH AGRAHAYANA, 1940
WA.No. 1773 of 2015
AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC 11744/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 28-04-2015
APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
ARSHIDA ABDUL RAZAK, AGED 35 YEARS, W/O.ABDUL RAZAK,
T.T. HOUSE, KARIMPAM, THALIPARAMBA.
BY ADV. SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI - 110 001.
WA.No. 1773 of 2015 2
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29.11.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
WA.No. 1773 of 2015
3
JUDGMENT
Hrishikesh Roy, C.J.
The learned counsel Sri.T.M.Abdul Latheef appearing for the appellants submits that the litigant is not interested to pursue this matter. In view of such submission and having regard to the fact that steps for serving notice on the 8th respondent is yet to be taken, the Writ Appeal stands dismissed.
Sd/-
Hrishikesh Roy, Chief Justice
Sd/-
A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar, Judge
vpv
/TRUE COPY/
P.A. TO JUDGE
Arshida Abdul Razak
Union of India
The Director General of Police, Thiruvananthapuram
The Human Rights Commission
The Women's Commission
Abdulsalam B.K.
Hrishikesh Roy
A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
