Manager, Bata Shoe Store v. a.L.Domini
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala disposed of a writ appeal filed by an employer challenging a reinstatement order by recording a settlement compromise of Rs.10 lakhs between the parties.
What did the court decide?
Writ appeal closed recording a settlement compromise of Rs.10,00,000/- and payment in aid thereof between the parties.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON
THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE 2018 / 31ST JYAISHTA, 1940
WA.No. 1192 of 2014
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 3883/2004 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 08-01-2014
APPELLANT(S)/2ND RESPONDENT
MANAGER, BATA SHOE STORE (BATA INDIA LIMITED), SWARAJ ROUND, THRISSUR-680 001. BY ADVS.SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR SRI.P.GOPINATH SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT :
- A.L.DOMINI AKKANATH HOUSE, MARIA SADAN, PARALAM P.O., VENGINISSERY, THRISSUR. 2. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL PALAKKAD. R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.RAMAKRISHNAN R1 BY ADV. SRI.C.ANIL KUMAR R2 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI RENIL ANTO
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ appeal filed by the employer should be decided on merits or disposed of by way of a compromise.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Manager, Bata Shoe Store (Bata India Limited)
- respondent
A.L. Domini
- respondent
Industrial Tribunal Palakkad
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court