Karthyayani v. Krishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeals were dismissed for default as the counsel reported no instructions from the appellants despite the case being listed and registered notices sent.
What did the court decide?
Second appeals dismissed for default.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
TUESDAY ,THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 / 24TH ASWINA, 1940
SA.No. 815 of 1997
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.2.1997 IN AS 86/1991 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, PALAKKAD
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.03.1989 IN OS 107/1981 of MUNSIFF COURT, ALATHUR
APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
KARTHYAYANI
W/O.MANI,RESIDING AT MUDAPALLUR AMSOM, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. T.C.SURESH MENON
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT :
Parties & counsel
- appellant
KARTHYAYANI
- respondent
KRISHNANNKUTTY AND OTHERS
Coram
P.B. SURESH KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court