Sarojam, v. Padmanabhan Nair
Case brief
What is this about?
The second appeal filed by the appellants was heard defaulting as there was no representation. The court dismissed the appeal on the same day it was finally heard.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
MONDAY ,THE 08TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 / 16TH ASWINA, 1940
SA.No. 536 of 1999
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20-08-1998 IN AS 646/1994 of SUB COURT,NEYYATTINKARA
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.02.1990 IN OS 600/1980 of I ADDL.M.C.,NEYYATTINKARA
APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS 6 TO 11:
1 SAROJAM,W/O GEORGE, AGED 45, W/O.GEORGE, RESIDING AT G.S.SADANAM, THIRUPATHOOR DESOM, THIRUPURAM PAKUTHY.
2 GEORGE VINOD, RESIDING AT G.S.SADANAM, THIRUPURATHOOR DESOM, THIRUPURAM PAKUTHY.
- 3 GEORGE VIJIN, OF --DO-- --DO--
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SAROJAM,W/O GEORGE
- appellant
GEORGE VINOD
- appellant
GEORGE VIJIN
- appellant
SAROJAM VIMALA
- appellant
GEORGE BYJU
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court