Antony v. Mathai
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular second appeal dismissed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam as it was not pressed. The registry was directed to return certified copies of impugned judgments. No substantive legal principle propounded.
What did the court decide?
Registry directed to return certified copies of impugned judgments.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
THE MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER 2018/30TH ASWINA, 1940
RSA.No. 867 of 2018
[AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14-06-2018 IN AS 77/2014 OF ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, NORTH PARAVUR]
[AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08-08-2014 IN I.A. 187/2009(FD) IN OS 307/2004 OF ADDL.SUB COURT,NORTH PARAVUR]
APPELLANT/1ST RESPONDENT /1ST RESPONDENT IN FDA :
ANTONY AGED 69 YEARS
S/O.MATHU, PARAYIL HOUSE, MEKKADU, NEDUMBASSERY VILLAGE, ALUVA TALUK, MEKKAD P.O. 683589.
BY ADV. SHRI. V. RAJENDRAN PERUMBAVOOR ADV. SHRI. GEORGE VARGHESE KIZHAKKAMBALAM ADV. N. RAJESH
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Antony
- respondent
Mathai and Thressia
Coram
P.B. Suresh Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court