P.v.Meenakshi v. Corporation of Kozhikode
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:…
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed as infructuous and pending interlocutory applications were dismissed.
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:…
The appeal was dismissed as infructuous and pending interlocutory applications were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 23RD MAGHA, 1939
RSA.No. 837 of 2003(G)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 20-08-2003 IN AS 228/2002 of FIRST ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, KOZHIKODE
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 08-10-2002 IN OS 725/2000 OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF'S COURT-I, KOZHIKODE
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF
P.V.MEENAKSHI, D/O.RAMAN, AGED 73 YEARS, RESIDING AT RADHA MANDIRAM, JOSEPH ROAD, KALATHINKUNNU AMSOM & DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK
BY ADV.SRI.C.P.MOHAMMED NIAS
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT:
CORPORATION OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY AND
ACTING THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, HAVING OFFICE AT BEACH ROAD, NAGARAM AMSOM AND DESOM OF KOZHIKODE
BY ADV.SRI.K.D.BABU,SC,KOZHIKODE CORPORATION
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12-02-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
A. HARIPRASAD, J.
R.S.A.No.837 of 2003
Dated this the 12th day of February, 2018
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the matter has become infructuous. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
All pending interlocutory applications will stand dismissed.
SD/- A. HARIPRASAD JUDGE
JV
P.V.MEENAKSHI
CORPORATION OF CALICUT
A.HARIPRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court