Biju v. Usha
Case brief
What is this about?
This regular second appeal is disposed of based on a compromise petition filed by the parties. The court ordered the registry to return the title deed produced by the respondent to enable document execution.
What did the court decide?
Registry to return Ext.A1 title deed produced by the respondent to enable execution of documents in terms of compromise.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
FRIDAY ,THE 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 / 20TH ASWINA, 1940
RSA.No. 647 of 2013
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05/02/2013 IN AS 29/2012 of II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT,THODUPUZHA
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28/11/2011 IN OS 229/2009 of MUNSIFF.COURT,THODUPUZHA
APPELLANTS / APPELLANTS / DEFENDANTS:
1 BIJU, S/O.THANKAPPAN AGED 36 YEARS
OOLANIYIL HOUSE, VELLIYAMATTOM KARA, VELLIYAMATTOM VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK, PIN-685 588.
2 LISSY D/O.DEVASSY
Parties & counsel
- appellant
BIJU, S/O.THANKAPPAN
- appellant
LISSY D/O.DEVASSY
- respondent
USHA, W/O.MOHANAN
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court