Muhammed Sayid.P.a v. Aseeba
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed a revision petition in a family court matter as not pressed upon the parties submitting that the dispute had been settled.
What did the court decide?
The revision petition was dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
MONDAY ,THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 / 7TH KARTHIKA, 1940
RPFC.No. 121 of 2018
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN MC 158/2016 of FAMILY COURT, THALASSERY DATED 14-12-2017
REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:
MUHAMMED SAYID.P.A., S/O.MOOSA, AGED 32 YEARS, DARUL SALAM, KOTTAYAMPOYIL P.O., KUNNUM MEETHAL, KUTHUPARAMBA-670691, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER A.MOOSA, S/O.MAMMU, AGED 71 YEARS, RESIDING AT DARUL SALAM, KOTTAYAMPOYIL P.O., KUNNUM MEETHAL, KUTHUPARAMBA, THALASSERY TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.K.SIJU SMT.RENY ANTO SMT.S.SEETHA
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:
ASEEBA D/O.MUHAMMED ASHARAF, AGED 21 YEARS, YASEEM VILLA, MUZHAPPILANGAD GATE, MUZHAPPILANGAD P.O., KANNUR-670662.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Muhammed Sayid.P.A.
- respondent
Aseeba
Coram
Sunil Thomas
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court